i
News
News · 2026-10-03

Google’s AI push in schools may be costing students the ability to think

@neuronium_ai @neuronium_ai

Google’s AI tools are moving into classrooms, and some students say they are struggling to work without them. The pattern matters beyond individual grades: schools can put a chatbot in front of young users before they have much choice about using it, while companies seek more people who will make AI a regular habit—and, ideally, pay for it.

Cover: Google’s AI push in schools may be costing students the ability to think

The classroom has become an adoption channel

The Wall Street Journal reported that students are noticing AI’s effects on how they think, but often cannot stop its spread at school.

An eighth-grader in Pennsylvania, Richard Scott, said Google’s assistant slowed his thinking. On a test where AI was prohibited, he struggled to think independently. Scott had previously earned B-level grades in math, but his report card showed he failed the eighth-grade final exam after increasingly using Google’s AI for schoolwork.

In Miami, art history teacher Kaitlyn Ruano told the Journal that student grades fell sharply after the school district gave all students access to Google Gemini. Some students told her they had used AI throughout the year and arrived in class without understanding half the material.

Fifteen-year-old Sofia Chatziani said Google’s chatbot was the strongest temptation because it was the easiest to access. Her grades reportedly worsened after she began relying on it to summarize school material. The chatbot was available on her school-issued computer. After she stopped using AI altogether, her grades began to improve.

Google’s long game with young users

The technology may be new, but Google’s effort to bring in users before they can vote or buy alcohol goes back decades.

In 2014, as Chromebooks and Google’s school software spread across the country, the company acknowledged scanning school email to target ads to students more precisely.
In internal documents from 2018, Google described its inexpensive Chromebooks and school programs as a “pipeline of future users” it could count on for years.

Generative AI extends that strategy. Its open-ended nature can place students inside a technology environment with few clear boundaries. For Google, that is the point.

The wider industry also has a reason to seek new users: companies such as OpenAI and Google need to justify enormous AI infrastructure spending, especially on data centers. Much of the adoption drive is aimed at businesses, where big deals can bring excessive spending and employee dissatisfaction. Schoolchildren offer another audience that could become habitual users over many years.

I think the classroom examples point to a gap the adoption story leaves unanswered: who is responsible for making sure students can still do the work without a chatbot? The reports describe students reaching for the easiest available tool, and some struggling when it is taken away. If schools become the place where AI habits are formed, the cost of growth may show up in skills students need when the tool is not there.

Daily AI news

Every day we pick what actually matters in AI and explain it plainly — no hype, no filler. Subscribe if you want to follow where the industry is going.

Only what matters — every day

Follow on X